Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Rawlins v Aetna Casualty; (ICC-UNP, 7/27/1978; RB #104)

Print

Ingham County Circuit Court; Docket No. 76-19490-CK; Unpublished    
Judge James T.Kallman; Written Opinion    
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:
One-Year Notice Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]
Required Content of Notice / Sufficiency of Notice [§3145(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:   
In a written Opinion, Judge Kallman ruled that where plaintiff did not give written notice to the PIP carrier until over two years after the accident, plaintiff was precluded by §3145 of the no-fault statute for maintaining a lawsuit to recover no-fault benefits. The Court held that §3145 "is a statute of limitations" and thus the failure to give notice within the one-year limitation period precludes lawsuits after one year.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram