Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Krajewski v Aetna Casualty; (WCC-UNP, 4/12/1978; RB #83)

Print

Wayne County Circuit Court; Docket No. 77-737-984-NO; Unpublished   
Judge Thomas Foley; Written Opinion   
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:
One-Year Notice Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]
Required Content of Notice / Sufficiency of Notice [§3145(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:   
In a decision dealing with the notice provisions of §3145(1) Judge Foley held that the oral notification given by the plaintiff to her insurance company on the date of the accident was sufficient notice under the statute where the defendant insurance company had taken down the plaintiff’s telephone notification in writing and the written memorandum of her phone conversation by the claims representative was made a part of the claims file. Judge Foley ruled that the statute does not define or limit the source of the written notice of injury and that the defendant clearly had written notice of the injury in this case. In this particular case, the plaintiff, subsequent to her telephone notification, was provided with a formal application for benefits which she neglected to fill out and return within the one year limitation period. Eighteen months after the accident, plaintiff retained counsel and written demand was finally made.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram