Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Helgeson v Insurance Company of North America; (JDC-UNP, 1/6/1978; RB #61)

Print

34th Judicial District Court; Docket No. C-7-1209; Published   
Judge Henry Zaborowski; Written Opinion  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:
One-Year Notice Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]
Resident Relatives [§3114(1)]
Separated and Divorced Spouses [§3114(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:   
Judge Zaborowski held that the one year notice requirement in the statute of limitations contained in §3145 of the no-fault statute cannot, by itself, bar a cause of action for PIP benefits. The no-fault carrier must make a showing of prejudice before the notice requirement will be a bar to the action. In this case the plaintiff failed to give notice within one year. The Court held that the purpose of the notice requirement is to protect the insurer from prejudice due to delay, not to shorten the statute of limitations.

Furthermore, the Court held that where the plaintiff was the daughter of the insured (her father) but was living with her separated-mother at the time of the accident, she was still entitled to PIP benefits under her father's no-fault policy pursuant to §3114(4) as her domicile in her father's household extends to separate quarters where there is an estrangement of spouses.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram