Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Ford v DeYoung; (JDC-UNP, 5/10/1974; RB #2)

Print

63rd Judicial District Court, Grand Rapids, Michigan; Case No. SC 74-60-2; Unpublished   
District Judge Joseph B. White    
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:
General / Miscellaneous [§3121]
General / Miscellaneous [§3135]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Legislative Purpose and Intent   


CASE SUMMARY:
The court held that the provisions of §3135 and §3121, which abolish tort liability for property damage arising out of an automobile accident and limit recovery to property protection insurance benefits, violate the due process and equal protection clauses of the U. S. and Michigan Constitutions. In addition, the court held that the portions of §3121 of the no-fault law which provide that property protection insurance benefits paid under one policy for all damage to tangible property arising from one accident shall not exceed one million dollars; constitute an irrational classification violative of the equal protection clauses of the U. S. and Michigan Constitutions.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram