Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Meyers v Auto-Owners; (ACC-UNP, 11/26/1984; RB # 796)

Print

Allegan County Circuit Court; Docket No. 84-6333-CK; Unpublished  
Written Opinion by Judge George Corsiglia    
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Disqualification for Nonresidents [§3113(c)]  
Obligations of Admitted Insurers to Pay PIP Benefits on Behalf of Nonresidents Injured in Michigan [§3163(1)]  
When Claimants Can Receive PIP Benefits Through the Assigned Claims Facility [§3172(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this written Opinion regarding the out-of-state disqualification provisions of §3113(c) Judge Corsiglia held that a plaintiff was not entitled to recover no-fault benefits as a result of an accident which occurred in Michigan where the plaintiff was not a resident of this state, was an occupant of a motor vehicle that was not registered in this state and the vehicle was not insured by an insures who filed a certification in compliance with §3163. The Supreme Court's recent opinion in Mills v Auto-Owners (item number 605) did not change the result inasmuch as the Mills case dealt with an out-of-state plaintiff who was operating a motorcycle, not a motor vehicle, at the time of his accident. Finally, the Court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover no-fault benefits through the assigned claims facility pursuant to §3172 inasmuch as she was not otherwise, "a person entitled to claim" benefits.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram