Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Michigan Bell Telephone Co v Roadway Express, Inc; (____-____, 4/18/1986; RB #931)

Print

39th Judicial District Court; Docket No. 84-1100-CZ;  
Judge William B. Ward; _____ 
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: _____; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Nature and Scope of PPI Benefits (Property Damage and Loss of Use) [§3121(1)]  
Certain Damages to Utilities [§3123(3)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this written Opinion, Judge Ward granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and ruled that plaintiff was not entitled to recover property protection insurance benefits under §3123(3) for the reason that its utility lines were hung too low and thus not in conformity with MCLA 247.186. The court found that plaintiff was precluded from maintaining this action even though the wires were not on or over a traveled portion of the roadway.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram