Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Reynolds v DAIIE; (COA-UNP, 6/3/1987; RB #1050)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 88899: Unpublished  
Judges Beasley, Hood, and Borradaile; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
General Rule of Priority [§3114(1)]  
Exception for Employer Provided Vehicles [§3114(3)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Motor Vehicle Code (Definition of Owner) (MCL 257.37) (MCL 257.401a)   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unanimous per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals interpreted the priority provisions of §3114(3) of the Act which state that an employee sustaining injury while occupying a motor vehicle owned or registered by the employer shall receive no-fault benefits from the insurer of the furnished vehicle. In this case, the vehicle was owned by one corporation and leased to plaintiff’s employer. The Court of Appeals held that pursuant to MCLA 25737, an "owner" includes any person or entity having exclusive use of a vehicle under a leave for a period of greater than 30 days. Under this definition, plaintiff’s employer as well as the legal titleholder of a vehicle would be considered owners for purposes of priority of payment under §3114(3). Plaintiff’s personal insurer had no obligation and was thus properly dismissed from the case.


Lansing car accident lawyer Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2022 Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookTwitterInstagram