Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.


Simon v Allstate Ins Co and General Motors Corp; (COA-UNP, 4/16/1987; RB #1037)


Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 88756; Unpublished  
Judges Shepherd, Gribbs, and Lamb; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   

Definition of Motor Vehicle (General) [§3101(2)(e)]  
Entitlement to PIP Benefits: Arising Out of / Causation Requirement [§3105(1)]  
Entitlement to PIP Benefits: Motor Vehicle Involvement [§3105(1)]

Not Applicable   

In this unanimous per curiam Opinion relying on an earlier holding in Logan v Commercial Carriers, Inc (Item No. 943), the Court of Appeals denied no-fault benefits to a plaintiff who was insured while driving a motor home chassis in a shipping yard. The chassis consisted of a frame, some wheels and a transmission with a wooden box located in front of the steering column. The chassis had no seat belts, no lights, no windshield wipers, and no turn signals. It was not registered or licensed. The Court denied benefits on the basis that plaintiff was not injured while operating a motor vehicle. The Court held that under §3101(2)(c), a vehicle is something that must (1) be operated or designed for operation upon a public highway; (2) be powered by a source other than muscular power; and (3) have more than two wheels. In its stripped down condition, the Court concluded, as did the Logan court, that the chassis was not designed primarily for operation on the highway. Therefore, benefits were properly denied.

Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)