Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Miles v Meenic Insurance; (JDC-UNP, 11/25/1996; RB #1907)

Print

52-3 Judicial District Court; Case No. 95-C03311;  
________________________________________  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Allowable Expenses for Handicapper Motor Vehicles [§3107(1)(a)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:  
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this case of apparent first impression, the District Court entered an order requiring that the cost of insurance coverage on a modified van is a no-fault benefit under §3107(l)(a) of the no-fault act, and that, therefore, the defendant insurance company should pay for the van insurance on a modified van provided to their insured quadriplegic. The argument made at the trial court was that since a van cannot legally be driven in Michigan without insurance, the cost of insurance on the van was a reasonably necessary expense for a quadriplegic plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident, and as a result, required a modified van.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram