Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.


Thomas and Taylor v Hill and MWP Industrial; (USD-UNP, 5/25/2000; RB #2161)


United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Docket No. 99-74061;  
Honorable Paul D. Borman; Unpublished  
Official Federal Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt  

Compulsory Insurance Requirements for Owners or Registrants of Motor Vehicles Required to Be Registered [§3101(1)]  
Disqualification of Uninsured Owners / Operators for Noneconomic Loss [§3135(2)]  
Liability for Excess Economic Loss Caused by Insured Tortfeasors [§3135(3)(b)]

Not Applicable  

In this written opinion and order, Judge Borman granted summary disposition of plaintiffs' tort claim under the amended threshold provisions of section 3135 of the act. The court dismissed plaintiffs' claim for noneconomic loss because there was conclusive evidence that the plaintiff was a co-owner and the operator of the vehicle involved in the accident and therefore, was precluded from recovering noneconomic damages under the provisions of MCL 500.3135(2)(c). Moreover, the court found that there was no evidence that plaintiff had suffered any wage loss or economic damages that would entitle him to pursue a tort claim for those out-of-pocket expenses. Therefore, the court found that plaintiffs' entire tort claim should be dismissed.

Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)