Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Arnold v Auto-Owners Insurance Company, et al; (ICC-UNP, 8/17/1977; RB #68)

Print

Ingham County Circuit Court; Docket No. 76-19110-NZ; Unpublished   
Judge Ray C. Hotchkiss; Written Opinion   
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:
Exception for Permanently Mounted Equipment Use [§3106(1)(b)]
Causal Connection Requirement [§3106]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:   
In a written Opinion dealing with §3106(b) of the no-fault statute Judge Hotchkiss ruled that in order for an insured person to recover no-fault benefits under the terms of that subsection in a "parked vehicle" situation, the injury must be "a direct result of physical contact with equipment permanently mounted on the vehicle." It is not sufficient for the injury to occur as a result of direct physical contact with property being lifted onto or lowered from the vehicle. Physical contact with permanently mounted vehicle equipment is a condition precedent to recovery of benefits under §3106(b). This decision was appealed to the Court of Appeals and oral argument was heard in April 1978.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram