Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company, Subrogee of King Milling Company, and King Milling Company, Individually v Consumers Power Company; (KCC-UNP, 8/13/1976; RB #24)

Print

Kent County Circuit Court; File No. 75-18606-AV; Unpublished   
Judge John Letts  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:
The court held that the property damage provisions of the no-fault law which abolish tort liability for property damage to motor vehicles and which also excludes such damage from property protection insurance benefits, is an unreasonable, arbitrary and unconstitutional scheme. Under the statute, individuals must purchase collision insurance in order to protect their vehicles. The court held that the legislative purpose for adequate and timely relief is not served by the elimination of tort remedies in damaged vehicle claims.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram