Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Hutting v Commercial Union Insurance Company; (COA-UNP, 4/6/1979; RB #179)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 78-116; Unpublished   
Judges Bronson, Maher, and Letts   
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:   
One-Year Notice Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]
Required Content of Notice / Sufficiency of Notice [§3145(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:
In a memorandum Opinion, the Court of Appeals held that §3145 of the no-fault statute is a statute of limitations and not a notice provision. Accordingly, since plaintiff had not filed his claim against his insurance company within the time period specified in the statute, his claim was barred. The decision is consistent with previous opinions in Davis v Farmers Insurance Group (item number 113) and Dolson v Secretary of State (item number 91).


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram