Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Burns v Auto-Owners Insurance Company; (COA-PUB, 2/20/1979; RB #168)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 78-1470; Published  
Judges Beasley, Walsh, and McDonald  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 88 Mich App 663; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
One-Year Notice Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]  
Required Content of Notice / Sufficiency of Notice [§3145(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
The Court of Appeals held that §3145(1) of the no-fault statute as a one-year statute of limitations and not a mere notice provision. In so holding, the Court agreed with the previous decision in Davis v Farmers Insurance Company (item number 113).

In addition, the Court rejected plaintiff’s argument that the notice required by §3145(1) could be given by anyone. The Court held that the language of this section is specific and thus, notice must be given by the injured person or someone acting on his or her behalf. If the notice is not given in this manner, it is insufficient under the statute.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram