Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Adkins v Auto Owners; (COA-PUB, 7/9/1980; RB #339)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 48409; Published  
Judges R. B. Burns, MacKenzie, and Kallman; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 105 Mich App 431; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Nature of Survivor’s Loss Benefits [§3108(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals held that the statutory requirement in §3108 that replacement service expenses be incurred "justified recovery to the extent of amounts expended or for which one has become liable." Thus, a widow was not entitled to replacement service expenses merely on the basis that the services her deceased husband performed around the family household were worm $15 to $20 per day. The widow was limited in her recovery of replacement service expenses to only those expenditures that she actually incurred for substituted services subsequent to her husband's death.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram