Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Hefelfinger v Auto-Owners (addendum to item number 192); (JDC-UNP, 2/26/1979; RB #335)

Print

77th District Court; Docket No. 4525; Unpublished    
Judge R.L. Miles; Letter  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a letter to the author from counsel in this case, it was stated that the summary for item number 192 was incomplete in that it did not mention Judge Miles' Opinion regarding the wage loss issue. Using the analogy to workers' compensation, Judge Miles awarded "differential" wage loss benefits to the plaintiff who had returned to work after an accident but was earning less money than before. The judge held that inasmuch as the plaintiff was making less money than he would have made prior to the accident, the no-fault insurance company was liable to pay 85 percent of the difference.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram