Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v Martin; (WCC-UNP, 1/30/1980; RB #272)

Print

Wayne County Circuit Court; Docket No. 79-920175-CK; Unpublished  
Judge William J. Giovan; Written Opinion  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Scope of Mandated Coverages [§3131(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Motor Vehicle Code (Financial Responsibility Act) (MCL 257.501, et seq.)   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a written Opinion, Judge Giovan held that a liability insurer could not avoid liability on a tort judgment on the basis that the insured failed to cooperate in the defense. Judge Giovan noted that §3131 of the no-fault act specifies what kind of residual liability insurance coverage is required. That section refers to compliance with the Financial Responsibility Act The applicable provision of that Act [MCLA 257.520(f)(1)] negates the noncooperation of the insured as a defense by the insurer against the judgment creditor. Since §3131 of the No-Fault Act incorporates those provisions for the residual liability coverage mandated by the Act, the noncooperation of an insured person does not relieve the insurer of liability for a tort judgment

Judge Giovan noted that the statutes construed do not expressly prohibit an insurer from abandoning the defense of a noncooperating insured. However, liability on the judgment could not be avoided.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram