Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Locket v Aetna Casualty; (WCC-UNP, 8/26/1981; RB #469)

Print

Wayne County Circuit Court; Docket No. 80 045650 CZ; Unpublished  
Judge Thomas J. Foley; Written Opinion  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Private Contract (Meaning and Intent)
Uninsured Motorist Benefits: Uninsured Motorist Coverage in General   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a written Opinion, Wayne County Circuit Judge Thomas Foley held that a Georgia resident who was involved in an auto accident in Michigan and insured under a Georgia policy providing uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of $10,000, could not collect more than those uninsured motorist limits under the theory that the minimum amount of residual liability coverage required in the State of Michigan by the no-fault statute is $20,000. Judge Foley held that even though the Supreme Court's opinion in Bradley v Mid-Century (item number 312) implied that UM coverage had become a substitute for residual liability coverage, that does not mean that a UM endorsement should provide the same amount of coverage as a residual liability policy. Since the enactment of the no-fault statute's uninsured motorist coverage is no longer mandatory in this state and, thus, there are no minimum requirements with regard to the extent of UM coverage.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram