Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Farr v Michigan Mutual; (SCC-UNP, 6/4/1981; RB #428)

Print

St Clair County Circuit Court; Docket No. 9-119; Unpublished  
Judge James T. Corden; Written Opinion  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Extra Contractual / Mental Anguish Damages    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a written Opinion, Judge Corden held that a complaint in a no-fault first party case alleging intentional interference with contractual rights stated a viable cause of action. The Court held that "the fiduciary duty of the insurer and the scope of authority of its employees are questions of fact" Judge Corden also held that the Supreme Court's opinion in Kewin v Massachusetts Mutual did not bar a separate tort count for intentional interference of mental distress nor for mental distress arising from "alleged acts of negligence." Finally, Judge Corden ruled that subsequent Court of Appeals decisions after the Kewin case would bar claims for mental distress damages arising from the simple breach of a commercial contract.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram