Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Osterhart v DAIIE; (COA-PUB, 1/22/1981; RB #381)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 48361; Published  
Judges R. B. Burns, MacKenzie, and Kallman; Unanimous  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 103 Mich App 143; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Workers Comp Liens Regarding Auto Tort Claims [§3116]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Workers Disability Compensation Act (MCL 418.1, et seq.)   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a unanimous Opinion by Judge Kallman, the Court of Appeals held consistent with the then existing great weight of authority, that a workers' compensation insurer was not entitled to be reimbursed out of a plaintiff’s third party automobile tort recovery. Judge Kallman reasoned that because the comp carrier paid purely economic losses and the tort recovery was for noneconomic damages, no reimbursement under the workers' comp lien law (MCLA 418.827) was permitted.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram