Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Kransz v Meredith and DAIIE; (COA-PUB, 2/24/1983; RB #616)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 55749; Published    
Judges Holbrook, Gillis, and Hoehn; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 123 Mich App 454; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
One-Year Notice Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]  
One-Year Back Rule Limitation [§3145(1)]  
Tolling of Limitations Upon Submission of Claim [§3145]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
This unanimous per curiam Opinion adopted the interpretation of Allstate v Frankenmuth (item number 464) regarding the time permitted under §3145(1) within which to bring a lawsuit for first party benefits. The Court held that if written notice of the accident has been properly given within one year, then a lawsuit may be commenced at any time within one year of the most recent allowable expense incurred, regardless of how long that may be after the accident date. However, that lawsuit can only recover for those expenses incurred within one year prior to the commencement of the suit In so holding, the Court reversed the trial court's interpretation of this section which relied on Dozier v State Farm (item number 268). In Dozier, the Court stated that §3145 is a one year statute of limitations which can be extended for up to one additional year by giving. In rejecting this interpretation, the panel noted, "This interpretation finds no support in the statute and has been rejected by recent panels of this Court."

The Court then went on to determine whether or not the "one year back rule" set forth in §3145(1) is tolled during that period of time the no-fault insurer is considering whether or not to pay the claim. Such had been the holding in the case of Richards v American Fellowship (item number 101) and a few other decisions. However, this panel rejected the Richards tolling rule in favor of a "literal reading of §3145(1)" as have other recent Court of Appeals decisions. Therefore, if an action is not filed within one year after a particular expense has been incurred, payment of that expense cannot be enforced, regardless of how long the insurance company was considering the claim.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram