Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Bishop v Farmers Insurance Exchange; (COA-PUB, 2/23/1984; RB #728)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 65672; Published  
Judges Brennan, Kelly, and Kaufman; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 137 Mich App 327; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals ruled that the No-Fault Act's denial of benefits to pedestrians injured by motorcycles, while allowing pedestrians injured by motor vehicles to recover no-fault benefits, does not violate state and federal constitutional requirements guarantees of due process and equal protection. The Court stated that the Supreme Court's decision in Shavers v Attorney General was "dispositive." In that decision, the Supreme Court, applying the "reasonable relation to a permissible legislative objective" test validated the exemption of motorcycles from the class of motor vehicles required to purchase mandatory insurance.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram