Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Baker v Pickering; (COA-UNP, 12/3/1986; RB #985)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 87553; Unpublished  
Judges Gribbs, Bronson, and Stephens; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:    
General Ability / Normal Life Element of Serious Impairment (Cassidy Era – 1983-1986) [§3135(1)]  
Determining Serious Impairment of Body Function as a Matter of Law (Cassidy Era – 1983-1986) [§3135(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unpublished per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court in favor of defendants on the issue of serious impairment of body function. In this pre-DiFranco decision, the Court found that, although plaintiff’s back pain was unfortunate, her injury had not affected her mode of living in any significant way. Plaintiff was never hospitalized for her injuries, continued to work 40 hours per week, and continued to perform her household chores. Citing Cassidy, the Court found that entry of summary disposition was proper.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram