Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Jernigan v DAIIE; (COA-UNP, 3/30/1988; RB #1126)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 93757; Unpublished  
Judges Kelly, Hood, and Warshawsky; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Work Loss Benefits: Nature of the Benefit [§3107(1)(b)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this one page per curiam Opinion relying upon MacDonald v State Farm, 419 Mich 146 (1984) and Smith v League General, 424 Mich 893 (1986), the Court of Appeals held that the "trial court was correct and that since plaintiff was unable to work as a result of the work-related injury to her finger, plaintiff would not have received wages had the accident not occurred. She is therefore not eligible for work loss benefits under §3107(b)."


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram