Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Hicks v Vaught; (COA-PUB, 2/4/1987; RB #1057)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 88788; Published  
Judges Cynar, Gillis, and Walsh; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 162 Mich App 438; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Liability for Intentionally Caused Harm [§3135(3)(a)]  
Evidentiary Issues [§3135]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unanimous per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals rejected plaintiff’s argument that her injuries need not meet the no-fault threshold of serious impairment of body function in a case in which plaintiff claimed her complaint could be read as alleging an "intentionally-caused harm" within the meaning of §3135(2)(a).

In interpreting the section governing intentionally caused harm, the Court of Appeals held that this statute unambiguously requires intent to cause harm and not merely "intent to do the act which causes the harm." The Court of Appeals held that plaintiff had failed to plead any facts which showed that the defendant intended to cause harm to plaintiff, and affirmed the trial court's denial of plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram