Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 88464; Unpublished
Judges Shepherd, Hood, and Allen; Per Curiam
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion 
STATUTORY INDEXING:
Determining Serious Impairment of Body Function as a Matter of Law (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]
TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable
CASE SUMMARY:
This per curiam Opinion decided after the Supreme Court's opinion in DiFranco v Pickard (Item No. 978) reverses the trial court's entry of summary disposition on the threshold claim of serious impairment of body function for the reason that reasonable minds could differ. As such, the case was remanded back to the trial court for further reconsideration in light of DiFranco.
