Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Buckley v Novak; (COA-UNP, 10/26/1993; RB #1668)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 130350; Unpublished   
Judges Brennan, Corrigan, and Anderson; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Determining Serious Impairment of Body Function As a Matter of Law (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING: 
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unanimous per curiam Opinion in a third-party liability case, the Court of Appeals affirmed summary disposition granted in favor of defendant on the grounds that plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to support her contention that she suffered a serious impairment of body function as a result of the accident The court does not discuss either the nature or the extent of plaintiffs injuries in this three paragraph opinion.

The defendant cross-appealed, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in denying costs and attorney fees under the offer of judgment rule. However, the court held that an order of summary disposition is not a verdict for purposes of the offer of judgment rule.  


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram