Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Kossow v Luukkonen; (COA-UNP, 11/13/1978; RB #130)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 78-1837; Unpublished   
Judges Gillis, Holbrook, and Maher; Per Curiam   
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:
Nature and Scope of PPI Benefits (Property Damage and Loss of Use) [§3121(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:   
In a short per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals held that the Supreme Court's opinion in Shavers v Attorney General (item number 85) left no doubt that under the no-fault statute there is no tort liability for damage to moving vehicles and that the Court of Appeals decision in Shavers (item number 12) permitting such tort recovery is not controlling precedent even for those accidents which occurred between the Court of Appeals decision and the Supreme Court decision.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram