Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Moore v Garter, et al; (LCC-UNP, 3/1977; RB #30)

Print

Leelanau County Circuit Court; File No. 76-325-2-NI; Unpublished   
Judge Charles M. Forster 
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Workers Disability Compensation Act (MCL 418.1, et seq.)    


CASE SUMMARY:
Circuit Judge Forster ruled from the bench that where an injured plaintiff who sustained compensable injury while in the course of his employment makes recovery against a third party defendant automobile driver, the workers' compensation carrier has no interest in the recovery made by the principal plaintiff when the plaintiff's recovery from the third-party tortfeasor is limited by the no-fault statute to "noneconomic" losses for the first three years following the injury. The basis for the decision was that no part of the workers' compensation benefits paid within the three years constitutes noneconomic losses. So ruling, Judge Forster paralleled the recent decision of the Michigan Court of Appeals in Murray v Ferris, wherein the court struck down §3116 of the No-Fault Statute, which permitted a first-party no-fault carrier to be reimbursed out a subsequent tort recovery for those PIP benefits paid by the no-fault carrier to the injured person.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram