Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Goldner v Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange; (BCC-UNP, 3/6/1975; RB #8)

Print

Berrien County Circuit Court; Case No. 74-002385; Unpublished   
Judge William S. White
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:
General / Miscellaneous [§3116]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Legislative Purpose and Intent
No-Fault Insurer Claims for Reimbursement    


CASE SUMMARY:
The court held that Judge Gilmore's limiting construction of §3116, to the effect that benefits must be reimbursed only when like benefits have been previously allowed, was inappropriate as it constituted judicial legislation. Accordingly, the court found that §3116, as written by the legislature, was unconstitutional as a violation of the equal protection clauses of the U. S. and Michigan Constitutions.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram