Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v Vancil; (COA-PUB, 9/16/1980; RB #346)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 47938; Published  
Judges Bashara, Riley, and Quinnell; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 100 Mich App 284; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Workers Comp Liens Regarding Auto Tort Claims [§3116]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Workers Disability Compensation Act (MCL 418.1, et seq.)   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a per curiam Opinion consistent with several other opinions by the Court of Appeals, it was held that a workers' comp insurance carrier was not entitled to obtain reimbursement for comp benefits it paid to plaintiff out of a plaintiff's right to recover noneconomic losses in tort under the No-Fault Act. The Court noted that "although the party may recover noneconomic damages, an insurer who has paid only economic benefits may not."

[Author's Comment: This decision is consistent with Great American v Queen (item number 125), Reliance v Messina (item number 93), and Flower v Gensterblum (item number 126).]


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram