Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Mair v State Farm; (COA-UNP, 4/13/1981; RB #399)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 45 857; Unpublished  
Judges Holbrook, Bronson, and Walsh; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Entitlement to PIP Benefits: Arising Out of / Causation Requirement [§3105(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In a per curiam Opinion, the Court held that plaintiff was not entitled to recover no-fault benefits where he sustained injury while hitching a ride on a railroad train in an effort to seek service for his disabled motor vehicle. The Court held that the injury did not arise out of "maintenance" of a motor vehicle in that an intention to repair a motor vehicle is not actual maintenance. Therefore, plaintiff was not permitted to recover benefits.


Lansing car accident lawyer Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2022 Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookTwitterInstagram