Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Smith v DAIIE; (COA-UNP, 10/15/1982; RB #592)

Print

Ingham County Circuit Court; Docket No. 80-26196-CR; Unpublished  
Judge James T. Kallman; Written Opinion  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Calculation of Survivor’s Loss Benefits and Maximums [§3108(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Extra Contractual / Mental Anguish Damages
Fraud/Misrepresentation    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this written Opinion, Judge Kallman made the following rulings. First, the judge ruled that the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v State Farm, item number 378, invalidating a personal consumption setoff in survivor's loss cases, should have retroactive application to all lawfully pending cases which raise the issue of the personal consumption factor setoff and to all cases filed after the date of the Miller decision.

Second, Judge Kallman ruled that exemplary damages for mental anguish are not recoverable as a result of a mere breach of a no-fault insurance contract.

Third, Judge Kallman ruled that the no-fault statute does not impose a fiduciary duty upon an insurance company, the breach of which creates a separately actionable tort. Fourth, the Court held that in order to maintain an action for fraud in a no-fault first party case, the elements of actionable fraud must be pled with particularity.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram