Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Maynard v Sauseda and United Fire Insurance Company; (COA-PUB, 12/6/1982; RB #584)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 55444 and 55445; Published  
Judges Cavanagh, Allen, and Penzien; Unanimous  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 121 Mich App 644; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Loss of Consortium Claims [§3135]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In an Opinion which deals with many non-no-fault issues, this panel of the Court of Appeals noted that the Supreme Court has clearly ruled in Rusinek v Schultz, item number 430, that the No-Fault Act has not abrogated actions for loss of consortium.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram