Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Paul v State Farm Insurance; (COA-UNP, 12/8/1986; RB #991)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 88836; Unpublished  
Judges Maher, Walsh, and Stell; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Rights and Immunities Applicable to Nonresident Claimants and Foreign Insurers [§3163(3)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Private Contract (Meaning and Intent)    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unpublished per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals rejected plaintiff’s argument that an April 19,1984 amendment to Michigan's no-fault law unconstitutionally impaired the automobile liability policy issued to plaintiff by the defendant in Colorado prior to the amendment. The statutory amendment revised the definition of "motor vehicle" to expressly exclude farm tractors and other implements of husbandry. Plaintiff was injured while riding a trailer being pulled by a tractor. The accident took place after the amendment, and occurred within the State of Michigan.

The Court held that the defendant's liability arose under §3163 of the No-Fault Act, which requires application of the relevant provisions of the Michigan statute "as they existed on the date of the accident." Citing Transport Insurance v Home Insurance (Item No. 737), the Court of Appeals held that the actual terms of the Colorado insurance policy were irrelevant under §3163.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram