Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Morse v Loomis; (COA-PUB, 3/16/1987; RB #1029)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 86476; Published    
Judges R.B. Burns, Gribbs, and Cooper; Unanimous; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  158 Mich App 519; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:    
Determining Serious Impairment of Body Function as a Matter Of Law (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unanimous per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals held that in light of the Supreme Court's decision in DiFranco v Pickard (Item No. 978), threshold claims for permanent serious disfigurement should not be summarily dismissed where reasonable minds could differ as to whether the threshold had been crossed. The Court stated, "accordingly, we direct the trial court to also reconsider the permanent serious disfigurement issue in light of DiFranco"


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram