Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Gies v Satellite Auto Parking of Detroit; (COA-UNP, 4/25/1989; RB #1258)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No104165; Unpublished  
Judges Beasley, Gillis, and Brennan; Unanimous; Per Curiam    
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Determining Serious Impairment of Body Function As a Matter of Law (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this unanimous per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed partial summary disposition in favor of the defendant on the issue of serious impairment of body function.

In a decision of summary disposition entered on November 19,1986, the trial court found that plaintiff did not suffer a serious impairment of body function under the standards set forth in Cassidy v McGovern.

On appeal, the court held that the Supreme Court's decision in DiFranco did not apply because the entry of summary disposition was made before the date DiFranco was decided.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram