Injured? Contact Sinas Dramis for a free consultation.

   

Wheeler v Tasker; (COA-UNP, 5/11/1999; RB #2060)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 205360; Unpublished   
Judges Saad, Murphy, and O'Connell; Unanimous; Per Curiam   
Official Michigan Reporter Citation:  Not Applicable; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:   
Serious Impairment of Body Function Definition (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]   
General Ability / Normal Life Element of Serious Impairment (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]

TOPICAL INDEXING:   
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:   
In this unanimous per curiam unpublished Opinion, the Court of Appeals upheld the trial court finding as a matter of law that plaintiff’s stiffness in the back of his neck and upper back, diagnosed as a cervical and lumbar strain, did not rise to the level of a serious impairment of body function under section 3135(1) of the No-Fault Act under the DiFranco standard.   

The medical evidence demonstrated that plaintiff sought treatment from her physician five (5) days after the automobile accident, complaining of stiffness in the back of her neck and upper back. She was diagnosed with cervical and lumbar strain. She saw her physician three (3) times over a span of six (6) months and received physical therapy and medication. Immediately after the accident, plaintiff was diagnosed with a 20% limitation in neck and back movement. Six (6) weeks after the accident, her range of motion in her neck had returned to normal and the range of motion in her back had improved. There was no evidence that plaintiff’s physician had placed any restrictions on her job-related activities when she returned to work as a dry cleaner one (I) month after the accident.   

The Court of Appeals found that plaintiff had put forward no evidence indicating that any discomfort or other result of her accident significantly restricted or otherwise impaired an important body function, and therefore, reasonable minds could not conclude from the evidence before the trial court, that plaintiff sustained serious impairment of body function as a result of the accident.


Michigan auto accident attorney Stephen Sinas is the lead editor of the appellate case summaries published on this site regarding the Michigan auto insurance law. To learn more about how Stephen Sinas and how the Sinas Dramis Law Firm can help you if you have been injured in a Michigan auto accident, visit SinasDramis.com.

Copyright © 2024  Sinas Dramis Law Firm, George Sinas, Stephen Sinas.
All Rights Reserved.
Login (Publishers Only)

FacebookInstagram