68th Judicial District Court; Docket No. 76-7966; Unpublished
Judge Shaker
Official Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion 
STATUTORY INDEXING:
Not Applicable
TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable
CASE SUMMARY:
In an oral Opinion from the bench based upon a Stipulation of Facts, Judge Shaker held that under a coordinated benefits insurance policy, the coordinating-work loss benefits that plaintiff received from collateral sources should be subtracted from the statutory maximum wage loss benefit and not from the amount of wages that plaintiff actually lost The reasoning employed by Judge Shaker is somewhat similar to that employed by Judge Jack Warren in Bessette v Michigan Mutual (item number 133, paragraph 3).