Maynard v Sauseda and United Fire Insurance Company; (COA-PUB, 12/6/1982; RB #584)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 55444 and 55445; Published  
Judges Cavanagh, Allen, and Penzien; Unanimous  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 121 Mich App 644; Link to Opinion alt   


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Loss of Consortium Claims [§3135]

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable   


CASE SUMMARY:  
In an Opinion which deals with many non-no-fault issues, this panel of the Court of Appeals noted that the Supreme Court has clearly ruled in Rusinek v Schultz, item number 430, that the No-Fault Act has not abrogated actions for loss of consortium.