Bishop v Farmers Insurance Exchange; (COA-PUB, 2/23/1984; RB #728)

Print

Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 65672; Published  
Judges Brennan, Kelly, and Kaufman; Per Curiam  
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: 137 Mich App 327; Link to Opinion alt    


STATUTORY INDEXING:  
Not Applicable

TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable    


CASE SUMMARY:  
In this per curiam Opinion, the Court of Appeals ruled that the No-Fault Act's denial of benefits to pedestrians injured by motorcycles, while allowing pedestrians injured by motor vehicles to recover no-fault benefits, does not violate state and federal constitutional requirements guarantees of due process and equal protection. The Court stated that the Supreme Court's decision in Shavers v Attorney General was "dispositive." In that decision, the Supreme Court, applying the "reasonable relation to a permissible legislative objective" test validated the exemption of motorcycles from the class of motor vehicles required to purchase mandatory insurance.