Michigan Court of Appeals; Docket No. 91757; Unpublished
Judges Holbrook, and Simon; Unanimous; Per Curiam
Official Michigan Reporter Citation: Not Applicable; Link to Opinion 
STATUTORY INDEXING:
Determining Serious Impairment of Body Function as a Matter of Law (DiFranco Era – 1987-1995) [§3135(1)]
TOPICAL INDEXING:
Not Applicable
CASE SUMMARY:
This unanimous per curiam Opinion decided after the Supreme Court's decision DiFranco v Pickard (Item No. 978), reverses the trial court's entry of summary disposition on plaintiff’s claim of permanent serious disfigurement. The Court held that DiFranco "casts a new light" on permanent serious disfigurement cases, and thus remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings in conformity with DiFranco.